PARENTAL ALIENATION theory exposed states

PARENTAL ALIENATION theory exposed states

 Subscribe to posts

Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District.

posted Jul 30, 2011 3:07 PM by victorious children

794 N.E.2d 868 (2003)342 Ill. App.3d 207276 Ill.Dec. 618 In re MARRIAGE OF Norma Perez De BATES, n/k/a Norma I. Perez, Petitioner-Appellant and Cross-Appellee, and R. Edward Bates, Respondent-Appellee and Cross-Appellant. Nos. 2-02-0488, 2-02-0516, 2-02-0597.http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=16182311807902398293&q=related:TTTw5WgCNEwJ:scholar.google.com/&hl=en&as_sdt=0,50

(

Nev: Supreme Court, 1994

posted Jul 30, 2011 3:01 PM by victorious children

Truax v. Truax 874 P. 2d 10, 110 Nev. 437 - Nev: Supreme Court, 1994 - Google ScholarThe litigants have been fighting over the custody of their three children for the past several years. This fight has been the stage for a myriad of allegations, formal charges, and official court battles. As of 1991, the parents were subject to a "shared" or joint physical custody order ...

(E)

Smith v. Smith, 2003 Conn. Super. LEXIS 2039

posted Jul 30, 2011 2:48 PM by victorious children   [ updated Jul 30, 2011 2:53 PM ]

Smith v. Smith, 2003 Conn. Super. LEXIS 2039 http://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=2021323891397301613&as_sdt=5,50&sciodt=0,50&hl=en   [CITATION] Case v. Richardson 1996 Conn. Super. LEXIS 1836 - 1996Cited by 4 - How cited - Related articles http://scholar.google.com/scholar?start=10&q=related:TTTw5WgCNEwJ:scholar.google.com/&hl=en&as_sdt=0,50

(

Mich

posted Jul 30, 2011 2:45 PM by victorious children

CITATION] In the Matter of Amber Spencley2000 Mich App. LEXIS 1770 - 2000 http://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=13697086234685752752&hl=en&as_sdt=5,50&sciodt=0,50

Conner v. Renz, No., 1995 Ohio App. LEXIS 176

posted Jul 30, 2011 2:44 PM by victorious children   [ updated Jul 30, 2011 2:52 PM ]

http://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=9275727898693802544&as_sdt=5,50&sciodt=0,50&hl=en    CITATION] Pathan v. Pathan2000 Ohio App. LEXIS 119 - 2000Cited by 4 - How cited - Related articles [CITATION] Bates v. Bates 2001 Ohio App. LEXIS 5428 - 2001Cited by 4 - Related articles http://scholar.google.com/scholar?start=10&q=related:TTTw5WgCNEwJ:scholar.google.com/&hl=en&as_sdt=0,50   CITATION] Toto v. Toto1992 Ohio App. LEXIS 157 - 1992Cited by 4 - How cited - Related articles http://scholar.google.com/scholar?start=10&q=related:TTTw5WgCNEwJ:scholar.google.com/&hl=en&as_sdt=0,50

(E

Chambers v. Chambers, 2000 Ark. App. LEXIS 476 - 2000

posted Jul 30, 2011 2:40 PM by victorious children

Chambers v. Chambers, 2000 Ark. App. LEXIS 476 - 2000 http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?about=5491016495229056077&q=related:nwibR0_MEe4J:scholar.google.com/&hl=en&as_sdt=0,50

Karen B. v. CLYDE M., 151 Misc. 2d 794 - NY: Family

posted Jul 30, 2011 2:38 PM by victorious children

Karen B. v. CLYDE M., 151 Misc. 2d 794 - NY: Family http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1723255300975981275&q=related:nwibR0_MEe4J:scholar.google.com/&hl=en&as_sdt=0,50

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.May 8, 2002.

posted Jul 30, 2011 2:35 PM by victorious children   [ updated Jul 30, 2011 3:06 PM ]

Perlow v. Berg-Perlow, 816 So. 2d 210 - Fla: Dist. Court http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8002499147783647449&q=related:nwibR0_MEe4J:scholar.google.com/&hl=en&as_sdt=0,50   Perlow v. Berg-Perlow, 816 So. 2d 210 - Fla: Dist. Court of Appeals, 4th Dist. 2002 http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8002499147783647449&q=related:TTTw5WgCNEwJ:scholar.google.com/&hl=en&as_sdt=0,50

(

Indiana White v. White, 655 NE 2d 523 - Ind

posted Jul 30, 2011 2:33 PM by victorious children   [ updated Jul 30, 2011 2:43 PM ]

No. 49A02-9406-CV-352. Court of Appeals of Indiana. August 31, 1995.http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2007745528342022264&q=related:nwibR0_MEe4J:scholar.google.com/&hl=en&as_sdt=0,50 759 N.E.2d 265 (2001) Garry L. KIRK, Appellant-Petitioner, v. Kathy Mae KIRK, Appellee-Respondent. No. 45A03-0103-CV-80. Court of Appeals of Indiana. December 5, 2001.Rehearing Denied January 9, 2002.http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10790073738847379074&q=related:nwibR0_MEe4J:scholar.google.com/&hl=en&as_sdt=0,50

)

In the Interest of T.M.W., 553 So. 2d 260, 262 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989).

posted Jul 30, 2011 12:45 PM by victorious children   [ updated Jul 30, 2011 12:46 PM ]

In the Interest of T.M.W., 553 So. 2d 260, 262 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989). In T.M.W. , a birth father opposed the adoption of his daughter by her stepfather. He attempted to justify his conceded lack of contact or communication with the child for several years by contending the presence of PAS. The court granted an order requiring a psychological evaluation of the child with a view to determining whether PAS was present. The Florida District Court of Appeals overturned the order requiring the examination because it failed to meet Florida 's technical requirements. The court specifically declined to make a finding regarding the general acceptance of PAS, however, it permitted a new order to be issued provided the new order met the requirements of the statute. In a footnote, the reviewing court noted that no determination was made as to the general professional acceptance of PAS as a diagnostic tool and went on further to recite the cautionary words of other commentators: "When considering the theory of expert testimony discussed in this subsection, it is vitally important to avoid confusion engendered by reference to syndromes.... [A]t the present time experts have not achieved consensus on the existence of a psychological syndrome that can detect a child's sexual abuse. Use of the word syndrome leads only to confusion and to unwarranted and unworkable comparisons to battered child syndrome. The best course is to avoid any mention of syndromes." citing Myers, Expert Testimony in Child Sexual Abuse Litigation , 68 Neb. L. Rev. 69 (1989). http://www.leadershipcouncil.org/1/pas/leg.html

(

‹ Prev    1-10 of 14    Next ›